<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:introParagraphLimit="2"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dismissing Discrimination	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://worklaw.jotwell.com/dismissing-discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://worklaw.jotwell.com/dismissing-discrimination/</link>
	<description>The Journal of Things We Like (Lots)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James Grimmelmann		</title>
		<link>https://worklaw.jotwell.com/dismissing-discrimination/#comment-53276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Grimmelmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklawjotwell.dewjbxx2-liquidwebsites.com/?p=861#comment-53276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know that you don&#039;t want to &quot;engage with the substance of the criticisms of Goffman’s work,&quot; but don&#039;t those criticisms seriously undermine the value of invoking Goffman at all? The critique of the way that a court&#039;s dismissal of a party&#039;s claims delegitimizes them as unworthy or unbelievable would be stronger without the comparison to _On the Run_, whose assertions about police practices in hospitals appear to have been fabricated. Indeed, given the way Goffman interjected herself into the story, essentially appropriating her subjects&#039; disadvantaged status to shield herself from criticism, the linkage probably makes things worse rather than better for the people for whose voices _Dismissal_ seeks a hearing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that you don&#8217;t want to &#8220;engage with the substance of the criticisms of Goffman’s work,&#8221; but don&#8217;t those criticisms seriously undermine the value of invoking Goffman at all? The critique of the way that a court&#8217;s dismissal of a party&#8217;s claims delegitimizes them as unworthy or unbelievable would be stronger without the comparison to _On the Run_, whose assertions about police practices in hospitals appear to have been fabricated. Indeed, given the way Goffman interjected herself into the story, essentially appropriating her subjects&#8217; disadvantaged status to shield herself from criticism, the linkage probably makes things worse rather than better for the people for whose voices _Dismissal_ seeks a hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
